Comments on: Mex-a-Tron! http://www.dougalstanton.net/blog/index.php/2010/07/08/mex-a-tron/ Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:21:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Ken http://www.dougalstanton.net/blog/index.php/2010/07/08/mex-a-tron/comment-page-1/#comment-17572 Ken Sun, 11 Jul 2010 09:17:19 +0000 http://www.dougalstanton.net/blog/?p=1106#comment-17572 <p>fair enough... a classic in its time, like Citizen Kane (shock horror, indrawing of breath etc)</p> fair enough… a classic in its time, like Citizen Kane (shock horror, indrawing of breath etc)

]]> By: Dougal http://www.dougalstanton.net/blog/index.php/2010/07/08/mex-a-tron/comment-page-1/#comment-17571 Dougal Sun, 11 Jul 2010 09:08:52 +0000 http://www.dougalstanton.net/blog/?p=1106#comment-17571 <p>No, I don't think you'll be missing anything earth-shattering if you don't see it. I guess it would have been graphically mind-blowing at the time but it's still a bit incoherent and slightly disappointing in the end.</p> No, I don’t think you’ll be missing anything earth-shattering if you don’t see it. I guess it would have been graphically mind-blowing at the time but it’s still a bit incoherent and slightly disappointing in the end.

]]> By: Ken http://www.dougalstanton.net/blog/index.php/2010/07/08/mex-a-tron/comment-page-1/#comment-17570 Ken Sat, 10 Jul 2010 17:12:50 +0000 http://www.dougalstanton.net/blog/?p=1106#comment-17570 <p>I have also managed to get through life so far without seeing Tron. My recollection, which I have just checked to make sure I wasn't saying something dumb, was that it was made by Walt Disney Pictures.... amazing, from your description, that it got made, or does it have any aspects which feel Disneyish?</p> <p>Worth a look, then?</p> I have also managed to get through life so far without seeing Tron. My recollection, which I have just checked to make sure I wasn’t saying something dumb, was that it was made by Walt Disney Pictures…. amazing, from your description, that it got made, or does it have any aspects which feel Disneyish?

Worth a look, then?

]]>