<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Documentaries and Ofcom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dougalstanton.net/blog/index.php/2010/02/05/documentaries-and-ofcom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dougalstanton.net/blog/index.php/2010/02/05/documentaries-and-ofcom/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 20:17:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://www.dougalstanton.net/blog/index.php/2010/02/05/documentaries-and-ofcom/comment-page-1/#comment-17446</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 08:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dougalstanton.net/blog/?p=997#comment-17446</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Presumably their argument is that it&#039;s harder to be clear what is fact in a documentary, than when you are reporting something that has or hasn&#039;t just happened.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Which is true if you take the primary school view of &#039;the news tells us what has happened&#039; not their perspective of it, and if you believe the &#039;present belief lies 50% between two polar opposite views&#039; tabloid take on science and controversy. Which grown ups shouldn&#039;t.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;All of which leaves me to believe Offcom (or at least the legislative documents they work to) have no balls.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Presumably their argument is that it&#8217;s harder to be clear what is fact in a documentary, than when you are reporting something that has or hasn&#8217;t just happened.</p>

<p>Which is true if you take the primary school view of &#8216;the news tells us what has happened&#8217; not their perspective of it, and if you believe the &#8216;present belief lies 50% between two polar opposite views&#8217; tabloid take on science and controversy. Which grown ups shouldn&#8217;t.</p>

<p>All of which leaves me to believe Offcom (or at least the legislative documents they work to) have no balls.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
