Sometimes, the denizens of the internet just disgust me with their absurd ignorance and desperate need to wade in with irrelevant advice. So I thought I’d keep my ignorant ravings on my own blog instead.
Today I am talking about Kamikaze Cookery’s latest Normal Person versus episode, testing the idea that celebrity chef recipes are manageable for the “normal” cook. The latest episode covered Gordon effing Ramsay. Go watch Normal Person versus Gordon Ramsay, it’s rather fun in that car-crash way.
Just don’t, whatever you do, read the comments. I don’t know why, but the majority of the commenters feel the overwhelming desire to point out that they didn’t understand the concept of the episode. “Look at me, I’m an idiot!” They berate the Kamikaze people for a bunch of irrelevant things, proceed to give really stupid advice about what a food processor is.
That’s the price you pay for being linked from Boing Boing, I suppose — an infestation of knuckle-draggers.
There is one element of the show that merits a bit more discussion, and that’s their definition of “normal”. In the first episode (versus Jamie Oliver) they used someone who clearly knew one or two things, like how to knead dough. The next episode (versus Nigella Lawson) their normal test subject didn’t admit to doing any cooking since Guides, and even then it was her mother who did the work. But still, she demonstrated surprising proficiency and flexibility. (I know this makes me sound like a pretentious twat, but I was honestly impressed that someone who claims to do no cooking is so proficient anyway.) In the latest episode their normal person didn’t know what a ramekin was and had never seen the phrase “season” in a recipe before. So, not to be too blunt about it, what kind of normalcy are they looking for here? Will the next normal person know which end of a knife to hold?
It seems to be Kamikaze Cookery’s belief that a recipe book should teach you how to cook, which has never been my experience. Celebrity chef books tend to be the very opposite of expositional — minimal instructions, glossy photos, lots of white space. The books which teach cooking are very different beasts and don’t tend to come with glossy photos. To my mind, expecting to learn cooking from a chef’s recipe book is a bit like expecting to learn the piano from a Chopin songbook.
Which of the books that we own would teach the basics (or help people along the complex steps)?
- Complete Cookery Course, Delia Smith
- Yes, Delia will definitely teach you how to cook. More importantly, she also tells you not to panic if any of a number of common things happen (something curdles, there are lumps, etc) and explains how to fix things.
- The River Cottage Meat Book, Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall
- I think this book would explain how to handle meat properly but would not introduce a person to meat in the first place. If you’re unsure about getting both hands in to a dead animal then Hugh’s not really your fellow. But if you want to get familiar with the obscure cuts (oh, and read some amazing essays) then it would be useful.
- Feast, Nigella Lawson
- I’m not sure about this one. There are two recipes I’ve made several times from this book. The mini white rolls were my introduction to breadmaking and were very successful. (Please ignore the batch where I forgot the salt….) The chocolate gingerbread is also a gorgeous beast, but it’s also the most horrifying mess to make. A lot of home cooks seem to be terrified of mess and the notion of dirtying more than one pan at a time seems to bring out the Ramsay-style expletives. Feast is for organised cooks only because all the recipes are so massive.
- Nigella Express, Nigella Lawson
- This book will learn you to cook by subterfuge. But she doesn’t assume you’re an idiot either. You won’t get anywhere without reading between the lines and paying close attention to the photographs (which are, thankfully, plentiful).
- Short-Cut Rhodes, Gary Rhodes
- I’ve never done anything from this book but I don’t get the impression that the recipes are very easy. I’ve seen Helen try a few things and they never seem to work out as desired. They’re supposed to be abbreviated versions of traditional recipes but they rarely turn out anything like the originals.
- Dough, Richard Bertinet
- I can confirm that this book will teach you how to make bread.
This is just the selection from memory. We also have a couple of Usborne kids’ cookery books which are used regularly. They will teach you the basics like no other. Similarly, A Young Cook’s Calendar was what I grew up with.
Helen’s definition of normal is pretty different to that assumed by Kamikaze Cookery, though it’s quite succinct: “a normal person should be able to make a white sauce, a tomato sauce and a chocolate sauce without recourse to a recipe”.
What do you think a normal person can cook?